Institutional quantitative risk analytics infrastructure for digital asset markets.
- Xapobtc2026-0678 ↑ 83Score moved from 78 to 83.
- Nexobtc2026-0663 ↑ 66Score moved from 63 to 66.
- AMINA Bankbtc2026-0689 ↓ 88Score moved from 89 to 88.
- Matrixportbtc2026-0656 ↑ 59Score moved from 56 to 59.
- Strikebtc2026-0642 ↑ 87Score moved from 42 to 87.
- Figurebtc2026-0684 ↑ 90Score moved from 84 to 90.
- Lednbtc2026-0636 ↑ 82Score moved from 36 to 82.
- Unchainedbtc2026-0676 ↑ 98Score moved from 76 to 98.
How ACI interprets risk.
Explore how ACI interprets risk across providers, modules, and methodology. Each ACI Risk Indicator is derived from structured evidence — not opinion, not inference.
What drives the MakerDAO ACI Risk Indicator?
The ACI Risk Indicator for MakerDAO reflects collateralisation ratios, DAI peg stability, liquidation threshold margins, and governance concentration metrics — each derived from on-chain data and publicly available protocol documentation. No single factor determines the output; the ACI Framework v1.0 applies a deterministic weighted computation across all criteria.
ACI's outputs are deterministic, its methodology is versioned and public, its evidence is dated and sourced, and every published ACI Risk Indicator is independently verifiable on the Bitcoin blockchain without trusting ACI. That combination is what makes it a defensible input into investment decision-making.
ACI computes risk. You decide how to allocate capital.
Request institutional access →